Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There are no incentives for bottom of the barrel programmers to write efficient and effective code, particularly when hardware in general have gotten so powerful and their own dev machines are probably overpowered for purpose.


The market doesn’t care. Making the program run in 1 second instead of 2 seconds takes the same effort as adding a new feature. The new feature empowers users more than saving a second, where they have the option of just buying a faster computer if they care.


Market doesn't have options. There either isn't alternatives or you can't refund anything with reason of it being slow...


There are always options. And always those looking to exploit untapped opportunities. And in the subscription age, you don’t refund, you just stop renewing.

There is no market for a photoshop competitor with half the features but runs faster for example. Because every tool is already tuned to be just fast enough that customers are satisfied.


Except this isn't a 1 second is good performance situation. Given the error the writer would need to buy a computer 11000x faster to make up for it.

Assuming scanning 44,000 files instead of 4 takes ~11000x longer.


What incentive exists for any programmers to care about speed unless it is a real constraint?

I’m not paid for a good user experience. My manager is happiest when features ship quickly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: