I read the article and couldn't understand it. I asked Gemini; Pareto things definitely sounds like science.

I read the article again:

- We had bugs. We let agents try to fix the bugs. True positive (fixed bug) is the F1 score. Here are the results for different models. Fixes worked 50% of the time.

- We needed to find a query. Without a knowledge graph it took 20mins, and didn't work. We used a knowledge graph. It was fast (20s), and found the right thing.

I gave my LLM my summary of the article and apparently I "hit the nail on the head".

I have no clue if I learned anything.

Did you mean to respond to a different thread?

>> if it is being invested in better generation and our aging infrastructure

If.

You’re completely right. Everything is perfect.

Except my phone is still really hot

Coincidence? It’s not like I am using any new features. Literally just a web browser. So?

The flagship example is 300 lines to implement word count

Step one - "upload your data" and we'll do cool stuff

Ok. How do I upload my data? Can't find any link.

Sign up for our newsletter. Nope.

And we went to Stanford? I don't care.

I'm not trying to be nasty, though it probably comes of like that. Assume I want to get started with your product and invite me in...

> Discussing code style once in a while is not a problem. What's a problem is discussing it at every PR.

I worked a team where this happened. Black was a godsend

That just means your coworkers are anti-social... this masks the problem but the real solution is educating people so they won't be anti-social anymore and stop nitpicking about others' style.

Teaching people to “just don’t be anti-social” is not the purview of people on a team trying to get work done, nor is it even possible in many or most cases.

Another step in the end of property. You don't own anything. You license it.

It does not seem like the end of property - somebody keeps owning what you license from him.

Assume it has a solution. Try that.