Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | opengears's commentslogin


did we audit the codebase already?


take a look at adguard home, dnsmask or unbound. the best is to run your own infra



ReCNC I think is published - this is the new fork



I'd love to build this on Linux. Is it known to be broken?


It should work but you'll need .net 10 and powershell. works on macos, win64 and winarm64 so far I just haven't uploaded binaries since it's just work between a friend and I on weekends to fine tune or fix things


Binaries would suck. Buildable source enables inclusion in distro repositories.


Why would publishing binaries prevent using the source elsewhere?


They don't.


doom emacs with evil (vim keybindings) and org-mode is the absolute killer app.


Puh, this is very shallow. "There is a growing call for sustainable open source, non-profits, and adjacent organisations that appears to align with the very strong culture of radical anti-capitalist organising and contribution in either free or open source software projects" - where is the source for that? Not everythying that this open is "anti-capitalist", and for sure not "radical anti-capitalist". The two examples given (NixOS and Rust) are particularly bad examples.

"The ideology of free software has failed to substantially deliver freedom in consumer software" - this shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what free software is about. This has been discussed a lot, and I want to remind us of the "don't contribute to open source" debate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nY_cy8zcO4


While the authors position is rather far from grounded and misses the key issue, which in my estimate is that "Radical Anti-Capitalists" went wrong with alienating productive members of software society in favour of pandering to fringe and populist politics unrelated to those fundamental and crucial in pursuit of ensuring freedom and digital rights.

Free software is indeed about freedom in consumer software. You're strongly suggesting that it is otherwise without providing any clarity or context. What gives?


Why are there no reverse engineering projects listed? These would make the most sense actually. Or future features of MacOS, Apple hardware designs (as Apple would not be able to patent them then)


Also works with UTM.


what would you improve?


There are also Architectural Decision Records (ADRs), which might be something similar. https://adr.github.io/


some folks also refer to these as PRODUCT decision records


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: