It’s not the same. AI potentially completely replaces intellectual work without creating any* new jobs (*almost any - there will be some extra jobs for building data centers but that’s negligible).

> without creating any* new jobs

So fucking make it so that people don't -need- "jobs"

It's about fucking time already.

Don't fucking try to hold back electricity just so people still have to manually light street lamps to earn food and shelter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamplighter

Ok I’ll make it so, you’ve convinced me.

If they are bad, why do people prefer them?

Because they're addicted to online content consumption. See also: sports betting, cigarettes, fast food.

It’s much nicer to use terminal on larger screens.

I know that, but how many people use terminals on their phones?

I do, don’t know about others.

> Folding screens have been a solution in search of problem for like a decade now

The problem is I want to have small phone that can be expanded to have large screen when needed, glad I’ve solved this decade long conundrum!

The US government is run by idiot with dementia. No wonder govt does not take any real action.

This one won’t create significant amount of new jobs though.

Interestingly the labs led by marketing CEOs have much better models (astra is A LOT better than gemini).

Existence of AI capable of solving millennium problem has enormous bearing on everything though.

What kind of enormous bearing? Computers have been able to do things humans can't for decades now.

Are you being flippant?

Are you avoiding the question?

The question is so daft that I’m not sure it’s worth entertaining it. But sure, I’ll bite - it will result in massive displacement in intellectual workers, without creating (a significant number of) new jobs.

you still haven't told me why this is different from the last 40 years of computers beating humans at stuff

When did they say it? Can you give a quote?

They admitted it once they were forced (HF found out about it).