heart recovery is one of several headline new features they mention on first run (and in app ref info) will calibrate over time
as often the case when Apple makes its move, their implementations -- while late compared to e.g. Garmin which has had them for years -- purport to be leading accuracy on these features among wearables
Very little ‘magic’ seems necessary for those, rather a little less human-in-the-loop team sports with our future, and a little more feedback loop science.
Self-selected ignorance and scrambling seem both correlated and causative.
That said, SOTA machines can't run an office snack bar yet, so it'll be a minute before abundances other than caution.
Note that Mac Studio Ultra M3 (or upcoming M5) with 512GB is effective. You don't have to do this work fast, overnight is fine.
Unless trying to use it interactively and adversarially, in which case it's not fast enough plus would be why those of us without our own datacenters will get told we can't have nice things.
On the contrary, the readme for this project, `litelm`, is contrasting with the bloat project, `litellm`. This project subty deboats an L.
The bloat (or featuritis) project has the 700mb and 100k+ LOC, this de-bloat has 2k LOC and specifies its only two deps ones most people want as deps (although httpx should be swapped to its successor).
So this response is off base, the 700Mb isn't forgotten, it's been dropped.
> why do we get a post like this from openAI then immediately after get the same thing from Anthropic and vice versa like it’s a single entity deciding what the next topic is to relay to us simple folk
Not relaying to us simple folk. The message is for government simple folk, amplified and relayed by us simple folk as constituents.
The common element is lobbying, for regulatory capture, to help pull up the ladder.
They don't have to be colluding, they just have to hear the same things from the gov at the same time (as they would), then it goes in media waves beacuse journalists don't as easily get published for a story about one thing as they can if two or more examples make a pattern.
If what you're doing makes money, the last thing you want is to stop doing the thing making you money. If, instead, it costs you money, don't wait until a usage surge to consider how to handle that – set it up now.
You also don't need any latency in the loop or moving parts that could wrongly interfere with the reliability of making that money.
Fortunately, the last thing this is is "opaque". You have all the observability you need to do what you want to do with unexpected usage.
What AWS (and every CSP) gives you is all the instrumentation and out of band tools to implement your own angel of death, to API kill a runaway thing if that's what you want to do.
You can also find countless TF and CDK patterns for it if you aren't sure how.
But please, no, do not ask to make critical systems subject to the whims of some billing decision enforcer.
The "why did they cut me off" complaints here far outnumber the "runaway bill" complaints.
This article recommending scrabble letter brands seems sketchy.
Anker offers lovely soft silicone sheathed USB-C cables, in black or white and many lengths. They perform for data and do not get stiff or discolor. Our office specifies these unless TB4+ is required.
> This article recommending scrabble letter brands seems sketchy.
Amazon orders are banned from our lab supply list because you never actually get the same thing twice, and they vanish on first bad review.
Related, I've been buying the exact color, style, and brand of sock, from Amazon, for the past ~10 years. I have a sock drawer full of completely different socks.
If you don't know how to use a marketplace like Amazon, then by all means stay away.
I've had people in real life start to recommend some product, "oh you just buy it on Amazon" and that is a thought-terminating cliché, because that's like telling me to "go buy it in the shopping mall".
So many reputable vendors have established presence in the marketplace on Amazon now. But you must carefully inspect every item in your cart, because you will find lots of brand-items advertised from fly-by-night sellers with poor reputations. But once you see your reputable vendor name, and/or "Sold through Amazon, fulfilled by Amazon" then I've never needed to worry about the end result.
No, this doesn't work either, by the way Amazon operates [1], and they're aware of the problem [2]. There's no "Anker" store. There's boxes in your local Amazon warehouse that "Anker" labelled stuff gets thrown into and sold as Anker products (although I think they've separated the boxes a bit in the last few years). I've had several counterfeits from official stores, and avoid Amazon for easily counterfeit goods. I had a counterfeit controller from the official Sony store that I took it apart, posted all the silly nonsense contained inside, and was banned from ever posting reviews on Amazon again.
Anker has steps to prove the product is genuine and only guarantee non-counterfeit from offline stores: https://www.anker.com/eu-en/verify
> When Amazon lists a product, that listing consolidates reviews for many different suppliers of that product. Some of them might be official Felco dealers, others may be arbitrage buyers who've picked up pruners from overseas suppliers at a discount.
See sections "We Are Impacted by Fraudulent or Unlawful Activities of Sellers" and "We Face Risks Related to Adequately Protecting Our Intellectual Property Rights and Being Accused of Infringing Intellectual Property Rights of Third Parties"
You purchase the ones labeled Anker?... They say Anker on the box and the cable... I don't think the supply chain is an issue as long as you get the intended product
Looks like list almost half not in the EU and half in, but missing quite a lot of EU countries.
Anker themselves say they "promise that all the products purchased through our Authorized Retailers or Distributors and Online Channels are genuine" but the link to who those are is gone apparently.
If you purchase from the official seller on Amazon, you're highly unlikely to get a counterfeit unless someone committed return fraud. I think platforms that destroy returns aren't susceptible though.
as often the case when Apple makes its move, their implementations -- while late compared to e.g. Garmin which has had them for years -- purport to be leading accuracy on these features among wearables
reply