It makes sense that people tend to upvote things thats make them laugh over things that make them upset.

If there is any positive to be had from this, it's that we finally started documenting the codebases for AI as we should have always done it for other teammates.

> It breaks the separation between structure and design

I have a problem with this argument because CSS _itself_ breaks that separation.

`border: 1px solid red;` is design, but `display: flex;` is structure.

In my opinion, it makes sense for display properties to live in the HTML because they are by their very nature very tighly coupled to the markup.

Though I appreciate that making this distinction creates a separate problem of your team having to exercise good judgement (and consistency) in which CSS belongs where.

You might be interested in Ponytail, which seems to address this specific problem: https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail

I'm not scared of rebasing I'm scared of force pushing

It's definitely a worldwide phenomenon at this point. Memes know no borders

MSN MESSENGER HAD THIS!

I used to play this with a friend. You would take turns, that is, the mines would reveal themselves in real time, and your turn ended if you missed a mine.

Then the game would call you a slut when it ended, because my friend's MSN was in Swedish and that is the word for "end"

No, that was regular minesweeper. The difference in this new version is that all the clues are revealed in the beginning.

Ah yes - my bad. I fixated on the part where you have to uncover the mines instead of avoiding them.

Wait, there's more to this than a meme?

Kernel level anticheat doesn't make sense on Linux because the kernel is open. There's simply no incentive to do that

An open source kernel doesn't prevent attestation mechanisms. Anticheats on Windows increasingly require Secure Boot, and all others drivers to be signed/whitelisted; they could try to put similar restrictions on supported distros.

Yeah, I imagine Linux support would be more like a supported Linux distro rather than generic Linux support. Something like SteamOS but with kernel anti-cheat and secure boot from the start.

Big question is whether they can make craching the anti-cheat it hard/unpredictable enough that the publishers will trust it. If the publishers release such a platform and someone releases a live distro that can crack it with 3 mouse clicks, that's a lot of wasted effort.

I have no idea how effective the Windows anti-cheat is, but I imagine that Linux tooling in general is going to make it harder to lock a user out of controlling their own machine.

Yeah, the nightmare scenario. I'm actually a little bit worried that we will look back on the last few years as the Golden Years of Gaming on Linux

In fact Android has secure boot plus its own stricter thing. Probably the most commonly running software based on the Linux kernel.

You literally got a research paper proving the contrary handed to you on a silver platter. We know what you were trying to say, the parent comment is calling you out

Oh, so because this one occurrence of disorder, we are now speaking “ovulating people” instead of “ovulating woman”. Not because of some people who don’t know what a woman is?

> Oh, so because this one occurrence

It's more than one occurrence.

> Not because of some people who don’t know what a woman is?

You could learn, but you champion willful ignorance.

They choose to remain willfully ignorant, ignoring science and prefer the ways of lies and deception. No amount of logic, facts, or intelligence will sway them.