A 5min 'best running shoes' session would mention both Hokas, ON's etc.
That's an anecdote, not a bubble in my opinion. I have a counterexample where I have not worn any Hoka's but have seen/known of them. Have multiple pairs of On shoes.
Gave it a quick go as I'm looking to adopt some sort of fitness app. There's too much text/complexity for my taste.
The website could use some images/simplification to get going and then have more details and whatnot later on. It seems that you let the LLM generate the content itself (em dashes, emojis) - Personally I'd be skeptical of a fitness app that has most of its content LLM'izied.
On step 3 of the tutorial, it's not clear that you can scroll down and there's more there on a mac 16''. I was confused what to do. It didn't allow me to change to metric system either (which I later found in the user-settings). You can't 'esc' from the tutorial popup either.
yeah, it's a difficult balance to explain why this app doesn't work like every other weightlifting app and not inundate people with too much information. It actually is pretty simple once you start using it. I'll look at the tutorial scrolling issue, and eventually rewrite the content.
The tutorial can't be escaped because it requires a liability waiver checkbox at the end.
But this is not AI coordination saving traffic. It's 'sharing economy'. And its already here and it sux. All the bicycles which can be borrowed for a few cents per minute didn't replace personal bikes, anywhere, I think. At least in Germany they created many problems for what seems a tourist convenience. Even worse with scooters...
Same with car-sharing. In theory good but in practice I'd rather own my car 100x than finding a car, making photos to record any damage, handling rubbish from others etc.
Hm, I see that is a problem, yes, but I thought we were talking about autonomous driving?
The crappy share-bicycles that nobody is responsible for also are kind of the opposite of the lender-owned car sharing car that might have predatory lending conditions.
In the end, what I would much prefer is sharing, yes. Vehicle infrastructure is public property after all.
I don't think providing better mobility that does not force everyone to have a car, at least in densely populated areas, would require a radical shift to a "sharing economy" for everything and anything.
You don't buy a car to leave it running in your garage. It is not simply a good that you possess, to use it, you already require a "sharing economy", just a different one. Car traffic is subsidized by everyone.
But I get that most people have issues with this idea.
And it is not for me to decide.
What I mean is simple: how public space is used is never an individual decision. The collective move to individual car ownership for everyone as a given neccessity for a normal life is not something that naturally comes from the existence of cars as a technology, it is a political decision.
Car owners don't use their cars on their own property. And the more cars we use, the less mobile we are, in cities.
Now I'm knee-deep in the discussion I didn't want, I won't see this changing in my lifetime I guess, I think it demonstrates a fundamental flaw in economic logic to treat car ownership as something that is only the responsibility and freedom of individuals, because cars are only useful when everything is built for cars, and in dense areas, this restricts the freedom of others, it's not only about the freedom to have a car.
Everybody is free to buy a car and put it into their garden.
Btw, I agree about the crappy bicycles, like I said, I don't get why you equate this with every idea about changing traffic policies around cars, which are not something that revolves naturally from the right to own property. The topic is that using cars for anything requires to use other's property.
The ages-old urban planning discussion.
Again, I got myself into this discussion that I didn't want and that tends to make me misanthropic, so I'll check out here. I'm also in working hours and need to leave.
For pro gaming perhaps the difference would make the slightest difference. For casuals, let alone office workers, the difference is 0 (writing this with a mx master 4 next to me).
Saying this as someone who has tried dozens of mice in my life. Last corded-one, bought for my son yesterday (razer cobra minecraft edition). I don't think I'd be able to tell the difference between wired and wireless in a blind test.
Wait until you find out that even when scanning everyone's bags, the TSA's failure rate is around 85%: https://abcnews.com/US/tsa-fails-tests-latest-undercover-ope...
Granted, this article is almost 10 years old. Even so, I highly doubt that this administration is willing to test (or report) the TSAs effectiveness.
I've tried using RustRover over WSL2 multiple times with every new release, but it's been a huge disappointment every time. My fans constantly spin like crazy, memory vanishes into thin air, and typing is super laggy - it even overwrites random sections of the file sometimes. On top of that, the built-in terminal is totally unusable because it craps out and freezes the app whenever there's a large output.
PyCharm, on the other hand, was always great to use. But since VS Code gives me pretty much everything I need for my daily work without demanding too much from my system, I've finally moved away from JetBrains.
> ...That is the realistic "install Postgres and go" baseline. RDS ran on its default parameter group, which AWS tunes for the instance size. Hostim runs its own managed tuning. In other words, the two managed options are tuned out of the box and the self-hosted default is not, and that difference is part of what you are comparing.
So... useless comparison vs Hetzner? Akin to comparing two laptops on a compile job, but leaving one in battery saver mode and then concluding that its 2x slower.
It’s like comparing the experience of buying an iPhone at an Apple Store versus ordering one online.
At the Apple Store, an employee will take off the protective film and actually help you set it up properly (RDS).
Running a benchmark on a default, unconfigured self-hosted Postgres instance is like receiving that online iPhone order, seeing it covered in shipping film, not bothering to transfer from your last phone, and trying to use it anyway.
Concluding that self-hosted is slower based on that is like complaining the iPhone screen is unresponsive while refusing to peel off the plastic just because "that's how it came out of the box." You are expected to take the film off before you use it.
Yep quite useless. It's well known that postgres defaults are tuned for low resource usage, not for max performance. There are calculators like https://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/ to get a better than default config with next to no effort.
Why can’t Postgres auto-tune these values itself in 2026? Microsoft SQL Server has mostly done a good job of this since about 2005. It will set parallelism thresholds, soak up as much cache RAM and CPU as the runtime environment allows, etc. It will give RAM back when the OS is under memory pressure, and schedule worker threads based on current resources.
A DB with a privileged supervisor process could generally detect how much free RAM, CPU usage/layout, etc at startup and re-evaluate periodically while running.
This is as unhelpful as it gets. The genie is out of the bottle - people can create unimaginable things with claude within hours. What would take months/years can be done in a day or a week.
Being banned on those platforms is a real setback for many users. One might argue that openai etc. are valid alternatives, but when they dropped fable (and perhaps reinstate?), not being able to use it simply means others can do more/better.
I don't know if it's unhelpful if you consider broader time scales. In 2027 or 2028, Anthropic and OpenAI might decide to stop subsidizing LLM usage and charge enough to profit. Would you pay $100 for a bug fix? They're already headed in this direction. Fable was 10x cost of Opus 4.6. They can't keep burning cash forever and we're reaching the peak of what can be justifiably spent on training cycles. Speaking of training, did OpenAI just give up?
> What would take months/years can be done in a day or a week.
Hahahaha, this reads like pure unadulterated marketing. I sincerely hope you're getting paid for these things at least, it would be sad for you to be this way without even getting anything in return.
Oh! Are you a 100% human programmer willing to write in your contracts that you accept full liability for all impacts of any bugs in your code? Do you buy professional insurance, or just write completely perfect code?
yup, same thoughts here. I think someone is trolling the irc members. It's so over the top, like an episode of 'the office'. I'd be amazed if this were an honest message.
That's an anecdote, not a bubble in my opinion. I have a counterexample where I have not worn any Hoka's but have seen/known of them. Have multiple pairs of On shoes.
reply